12 views
# Why Your Company's Communication is Failing (And It's Not What You Think) **Other Blogs of Interest:** - [Read more here](https://skillcoaching.bigcartel.com/blog) - [Further insights](https://www.alkhazana.net/2025/07/16/why-firms-ought-to-invest-in-professional-development-courses-for-employees/) - [More recommendations](http://espacotucano.com.br/the-role-of-professional-development-courses-in-a-altering-job-market/) Three months ago, I watched a $2.3 million project implode in real-time during what should have been a routine status meeting. Not because of budget issues, timeline problems, or even scope creep - but because nobody in that boardroom could actually communicate what they meant. I've been consulting on workplace communication for the better part of two decades now, and I'm here to tell you something that'll probably ruffle some feathers: your company's communication problems aren't caused by poor email etiquette, unclear meeting agendas, or even that passive-aggressive colleague who responds to everything with "As per my previous email." They're caused by something far more fundamental. And uncomfortable. ## The Real Culprit: Emotional Cowardice Let's call it what it is. Most workplace communication failures stem from people being absolutely terrified of having real conversations. We've built entire corporate cultures around avoiding difficult topics, dancing around feedback, and using corporate-speak to cushion every potentially uncomfortable truth. I remember working with a Melbourne-based tech startup where the CEO spent three months hinting that performance reviews were coming instead of just announcing them. The result? Team anxiety through the roof, productivity plummeting, and half the junior developers convinced they were about to be sacked. All because one person couldn't have a straightforward conversation. This isn't about being "nice" or "considerate." It's about fear masquerading as professionalism. ## The Australian Advantage (That We're Wasting) Here's where I'll probably annoy half my international colleagues: Australians are naturally better positioned for direct communication than most other cultures. We've got this cultural tendency toward straight-talking that should be our superpower in business. [More information here](https://diekfzgutachterwestfalen.de/why-professional-development-courses-are-essential-for-career-growth/) about cultural communication advantages. Yet somehow, we've managed to corporate-wash ourselves into the same wishy-washy communication patterns that plague organisations worldwide. We've traded our natural directness for management-speak and buzzwords. I worked with a Brisbane manufacturing company last year where the floor manager couldn't tell his team that their safety procedures were sloppy. Instead, he kept sending emails about "opportunities for improvement in our safety culture journey." Meanwhile, near-misses kept happening because nobody understood they were doing anything wrong. When we finally had him say, "Your safety checks are half-arsed and someone's going to get hurt," the improvement was immediate. Revolutionary concept: saying what you actually mean. ## The Meeting Paradox Here's something that drives me mental: companies that schedule meetings to plan meetings to discuss communication issues. I counted once - a client of mine had 14 separate meetings in one month about "improving our communication processes." [Here is the source](https://ethiofarmers.com/what-to-anticipate-from-a-communication-skills-training-course/) for some statistics on this phenomenon. Not one of those meetings involved actually communicating better. They were all about frameworks, protocols, and systems. Meanwhile, the actual problem - that their department heads hadn't had a genuine conversation in months - went completely unaddressed. The paradox is beautiful in its absurdity. We've become so focused on the mechanics of communication that we've forgotten how to actually connect with each other as human beings. ## The Technology Trap Don't get me started on how technology has made this worse. Actually, do get me started. Because Slack, Teams, and whatever other platform your company's using this month has turned workplace communication into a bizarre game of digital telephone. I watched a project team last year spend two weeks arguing in a Slack channel about a decision that could have been resolved in a five-minute face-to-face conversation. But everyone was "too busy" for an actual meeting. [Further information here](https://momotour999.com/top-communication-skills-training-courses-to-boost-your-career/) about technology's impact on workplace dynamics. The irony? They wasted more time typing than they would have spent talking. But typing feels safer, doesn't it? You can craft your response, delete the bits that sound too direct, add some emoji to soften the tone. ## What Actually Works (Warning: It's Uncomfortable) After twenty-three years of watching communication training fail spectacularly, I've learned that the solutions aren't complex. They're just uncomfortable. First: start having actual conversations instead of exchanges. That means phone calls instead of email chains. Face-to-face meetings instead of message threads. I know, I know - it's terrifying. You can't unsend a conversation like you can recall an email. Second: embrace productive conflict. Not the toxic, personal stuff - the healthy disagreement that happens when people actually care about outcomes. [Personal recommendations](https://www.floreriaparis.cl/what-to-anticipate-from-a-communication-skills-training-course/) suggest that teams with healthy conflict patterns outperform "harmonious" teams by significant margins. I once worked with a Sydney law firm where the partners were so conflict-averse that they'd built elaborate systems to avoid ever disagreeing with each other directly. Naturally, all the important decisions got made in side conversations and corridor meetings. The official meetings were just theatre. When we introduced structured disagreement protocols - essentially, making it safe and expected to challenge ideas - their decision-making speed doubled. ## The Feedback Fiasco Let's talk about feedback culture, because this is where most organisations completely lose the plot. I'll be blunt: your annual performance reviews are useless. That feedback you're getting six months after the fact about something you did wrong? Worse than useless - it's actually harmful because it teaches people that feedback is something formal, scheduled, and scary. Real feedback happens in the moment. It's conversational. It's specific. And it assumes that both people involved are adults who can handle reality. I remember a Perth mining company where supervisors were required to write formal incident reports every time they wanted to give corrective feedback to their teams. The paperwork took longer than the actual conversation would have. [More details at the website](https://sewazoom.com/what-to-anticipate-from-a-communication-skills-training-course/) about feedback system failures. Result? Nobody gave feedback until the annual review, when six months of accumulated frustrations got dumped on people all at once. Brilliant system. ## The Email Epidemic Quick tangent about email etiquette, since everyone seems obsessed with it: your email problems aren't about subject lines or CC protocols. They're about using email for conversations that should happen out loud. Email is for information transfer. Not negotiation. Not emotional discussions. Not anything that requires more than two back-and-forth exchanges. I had a client who insisted on conducting salary negotiations via email. Via email! Can you imagine anything more likely to create misunderstanding and resentment? When someone's talking about their livelihood, they deserve to see your face and hear your tone of voice. ## The Cultural Permission Problem Here's what I think is really happening: we've created workplace cultures where authentic communication feels dangerous. People have learned that being direct can be career-limiting, so they've developed elaborate workarounds. The colleague who says "I'm not sure that's the best approach" when they mean "That's a terrible idea." The manager who suggests "we might want to consider alternatives" when they mean "Start over." The executive who talks about "rightsizing" when they mean "layoffs." We've trained people that honesty is unprofessional. But here's the thing - and this might be controversial - I think most people are desperate for more honest workplace communication. They're tired of decoding messages and reading between lines. They want to know where they stand, what's expected, and what's actually happening. ## The Solution Nobody Wants to Hear The fix isn't more training programs, communication frameworks, or team-building exercises. It's cultural courage. Leadership needs to model direct, honest communication. Not brutal honesty - that's just an excuse for being an arsehole. I'm talking about clear, respectful directness that treats people like adults who can handle reality. This means saying "No, that won't work" instead of "That's an interesting perspective, but perhaps we should explore other options." It means saying "You're not meeting expectations in this area" instead of "There might be some opportunities for growth in your performance." It means accepting that some people might be momentarily uncomfortable with clarity, but they'll be far more uncomfortable with ongoing confusion. ## Getting Started (Small Steps for Big Changes) If you're a leader reading this and thinking "He's right, but where do I start?" - begin with yourself. Start saying what you actually mean in low-stakes situations. Practice direct, kind honesty until it feels natural. Stop prefacing every piece of feedback with apologies. Stop using qualifier words that diminish your message. Stop asking permission to have conversations that need to happen. And for the love of all that's holy, stop scheduling meetings to discuss whether you should have meetings about things. Just have the conversation. Your team is probably more resilient than you think. They can handle directness. What they can't handle is ambiguity, mixed messages, and having to constantly guess what you really mean. The companies that figure this out first are going to have a massive competitive advantage. Clear communication creates trust. Trust creates speed. Speed creates results. Everyone else will still be stuck in meeting rooms, discussing their communication strategy while their competitors are actually communicating. **Sources:** - [Other insights](https://managementwise.bigcartel.com/blog) - [Additional reading](https://fairfishsa.com.au/why-companies-ought-to-invest-in-professional-development-courses-for-employees/)